This is the volume 5 of 7 of the first serie Chronology by Fomenko and Nosovskiy in english. It took years to have it fully translated and finally available in paper form. This will be a changing article as time goes by. There is a lot of information in this volume. We owe a lot to their important research, but we have important things to say in order to correct it.
This article continues what has already been said here :
The Tartars who are the Cossacks and the Goths play indeed an important role in the foundation of european civilization in the 15th century, where they founded the etruscan and the venetian civilization. They brought with them the gotic language and the gotic alphabet that became what is known as etruscan and phenician (my statement). Though they did not rule them as part of their empire from Moscow or Vladimir. Malalas can say that Europe was not very populated, Matthew Paris that the Tartars were bloodthirsty, there is not a statement in their writings proving that they effectively ruled Europe. Such a statement is not either in the numerous european books published in the 16th century. This is one of the underachievements of the russian team : they state that there was a strong destruction of books in Europe in the 16th century and later. This is true, but the scale of it is not of the same importance as what happened in Russia or China. By the way Mauro Orbini writes about a civilizing role of the Slavs, not of a worldwide empire. And Marco Polo whose Book of Wonders the authors make a good analysis obviously did not live in a country submitted to Kubilai Khan.
The slavic power in Europe broke ties with Russia, and founded local cultures. So it came to be european and strongly italian by nature. We can confidently say that the title « King of Romans » worn by Maximilian I (who was never crowned emperor) is the title given to the « etruscan » kings of Rome. The roman Senate was created in 1493 and is called in german litterature Reichstag.
The french team Chronology 2.0 and I proved that the only real roman empire who called itself as such was born in 1530 with the crowning of Carolus magnus (Charles V) in Rome, and ended in 1806 when Napoleon I overruled the powers in Europe.
As Russia was an empire, Fomenko and Nosovskiy imagine that the late Tartaria that is displayed upon european maps of the 16th century is in full correspondence with the invading Tartars of the preceding century. This is not true : the Tartars are the Cossacks of Gothia or Little Tartary which will be later called Russia, when the future northern Russia was still called asiatic Sarmatia, and later Moscovia. Sarmatia is the name displayed upon the maps of Claudio Tolomei (Ptolemy) in the beginning of the 16th century. Many Hordes lived in Asia but we cannot safely say that all of them went to make war in the west.
And if such a unity existed, it is obvious that Ivan IV did not own anymore Asia and Europe. There are maps from his times where Russia is ruled by the « Grand duke Ivan, emperor of all Russia », but the limits of these Russia are clearly the european Russia, and Great Tartaria a different country. Viatka and Perm, though a bit out of place, have always been in eastern european Russia, and are not cipher names for Italy and Germany. The « Great empire » did not start to tumble down when the Romanovs took over. It was already limited to european Russia in the times of Ivan.
Though they make use of the very same maps than me, they do not read all the written lines. In the maps of Blaeu and Mercator in the 17th century, they clearly see Kitai (Kithaisko) in the Tyumen area to conclude that Marco Polo did not go to China. Though they blur the lines and say that the siege of the empire was in Vladimir and Suzdal. And do not say that on these very maps, Kitai and Russia are two different countries, and Russia barely drawn.
Moreover, they totally miss the fact that just near the word Kithaisko is placed the town Cambalich (sometimes Cumbalich). This is an embarassing fact because Cambalich is supposed to be a common name to design the « Khan’s Beylik » (maybe this is the real meaning, but … the town is not in Russia). The other embarrassing fact is the time of the map : 17th century. Older maps display Caracorum and Samarcand before. So this is Samarcand and not Samara on the Volga as Fomenko and Nosovskiy try to guess, and these towns were not the capitals in the 13th or 14th (as they place it) century, but in the end of the 16th century and the beginning of the 17th century. There is a possibility that the real Genghis and Batu lived in older times, when Scythia went to invade Europe. But the overall frame does not fit. Genghis met Presbyter Johannes as the ruler of another country. Obviously he could not be his « brother » Batu, possibly Ivan III or IV (Presbyter Johannes is very quickly displayed upon the maps by Munster as the ethiopian negus, in 1540, before the crowning of Ivan IV « the Terrible ». It could be a prior czar Ivan. Obviously Munster in involved in some faking on behalf of Charles V, as Jerusalem drawn in the « Holy » Palestine). It is said that they were the conquerors of China. Fomenko and Nosovskiy prove that China was conquered in 1684 by the Manchous, who erased the former past of China, and built the Great Wall as the frontier with Great Tartary. The Mongol invasion and the Ming dynasty are only a reflection of the Manchous.
We see here that Togtamis Giray was a Crimean Khan who reigned between 1607 and 1608, followed by Selamet then Janibek Giray. It means that Dmitry Donskoi who is the same character did not live in the 14th century and did not fight the Kulikovo battle then. By the way, Chanibek Khan cannot be the old « Ivan Kalita ».
Crimea is not the modern peninsula but the region just above. This is called Little Tartary, which by the way is not the Great one. On 17th century maps, this place is called Russia as well, while the Romanovs ruled Moscovia. When Moscovia took the name Russia, these southern rulers were displaced in the past, and came to be known as the old masters of the whole northern and southern Russia.
These great figures of Russia lived in fact in the times of the Romanov ! They were the very same enemies that the Romanov tried to overcome before they finally succeeded.
The fact that Ivan would be a ruler for eastern Christianity is in perfect concurrence with the very fact displayed by the authors that the new Rome and at the same times the new Jerusalem was the newly built capital Moscow. They are of the opinion that is was after Mehmet II the ottoman sultan – who was an ally – conquered the « second Rome » aka Constantinople, while the first Rome was maybe Alexandria in Egypt.
Globally, the etruscan chapter is one of the more convincing piece of work by Fomenko. Though we think there are some little mistakes :
- this was not limited to Etruria, but concerned Vanadis (Venice), Wendelig (Bavaria), southern France, Spain and north Africa too
- this was not an empire ruled from Vladimir and Suzdal, though Ivan « Kalita » could have been the Javan of the Bible whose heirs owned all of Europe
- Fomenko confuses Little Tartary and Volga, where the Goths come from with the later Great Tartary (1570 and on)
- There is a confusion about the Christ the Goths prayed: this is not Jesus (gaulish) nor Andronicus but Asar. The Jewish messiah is Eleazar, the egyptian messiah Asar/Osiris, the etruscan one Asar. Roger Sabbah suggested that the egyptian Book of the Dead could be the original Torah. Probably it could have been used as a kind of new Testament. But the original Torah was probably the Sudas, the etruscan religious book who is limited to a version of Genesis. Sabbah proved that the Moses story and the jewish law had been added by « greek » conquerors.
We showed that Mehmet II reacts to the overcoming of Rome by Charles V and it happened near 1530.
The more obvious candidate for Rome is… well Rome of course. We have some good reasons to think that Rome was called Jerusalem in the 15th century, because « King of the Romans » is a different title worn by the heir of the german roman empire (in fact there is no german empire yet, and roman is never associated with german, because it means the same thing.) and the conquests in Italy always concern the Kindom of Naples, the Duchy of Milan, the Kingdom of Sicily and an incongruous Kingdom of Jerusalem. It is supposed that no one would have touched the holy States of the Church which belonged to the pope as a gift of god. Well, obviously this was not so because Charles V and his lansquenets desecrated Saint Peter’s cathedral in 1526. As we displayed, there is a high probability that this was the temple of Jerusalem in which Jovis (Yahwé, Jupiter) was honored. It is known that the statue of Peter was formerly the statue of Ju-piter (Iao-Peter). It is said that the church was only sacked but it was heavyly rebuilt just after this.
We proved that the orthodox churches were precisely created in 1054 by the same apostles as the primitive churches in the 1st century, and five of them were part of the first « catholic » church of Constantine in 381. So it is Rome who broke ties with the other patriarchates. It certainy happened after the Romans destroyed the church of Jerusalem in 1527 who was the main patriarchate, and certainly not Rome.
We do not know for certain if there was a town named Rome in Germany. Trier pretends to be a more ancient Rome, but overall Rome is a name that means « Europe », as every ruler in Europe could be the emperor of the Romans. Henry VIII and François Ier were candidates along with Charles V. Suffice to say that Jerusalem was renamed Rome. A rabbi named Yohanan Ben Zakai asked if he could keep the church of Jerusalem alive in Palestine and founded a school of rabbis in Jamnia in Galilea. The gift was granted and used for the purpose of erasing the true history. Very soon Jerusalem is displayed on the maps as the Holy Land in Palestine. Very soon the school of Safed arises in Galilea in the 16th century. This is only the same school of Jamnia with another name.
But as Mehmet II was the keeper of orthodoxy, Ivan the Terrible intended to be it too. He wanted Moscow to be the new Rome and the new Jerusalem at the same times to command the orthodox churches that did not side with Rome. It is logical that he was called « Presbyter Ioannes » the christian ruler, and that he let the judaizing cult flourish in Russia.
It means that the Zadokites aka orthodox churches that broke away from Rome did found a new Temple in Russia. It is sound because the Karaite jews who live in Russia are said to be the heirs of the Zadokites.
We must remember that the primitive church is « catholic » (explains the orthodox catholicons), organized in patriarchates like the orthodox church, and the ruling caste is called Jewish, Goth or Frank (free people, citizens. The word is still used in the italian maffia to name the initiate that belong to the family.)
Alas it did not last long as Ivan and the russian khans (Cohen) were soon to be replaced by the Romanov family, who would come to change the meaning of orthodox christianity, who would no longer be the karaite faith.
But obviously, given the date provided by Fomenko and Nosovskyi it is clear that the Mandchous in China followed a jewish calendar.
Theognosis 